Reappointing Bernanke = Obama’s ‘Heck of a Job Brownie’ Moment?
Early on, I believed in Barack Obama’s campaign for change. I donated to his campaign multiple times. Since then, his continued support for bailouts, and his appointment of banking insiders to key political positions has turned me off to the Democratic Party forever. Republicans are no better, and I question whether I will ever again vote for a non-third-party Candidate again.
Word tonight that Obama will reappoint Ben Bernanke to a second term was disheartening, to say the least. Bernanke proudly claimed that he would “not let a depression happen on his watch”. Is that meaningful, if his actions only delayed and worsened the inevitable? Reflating the bubble is not a sustainable proposition. I thought Obama would be tough on banks, institute clawbacks, let defunct banks fail, etc.
If Bernanke’s thesis that disaster has been averted turn out to be false, where will that leave Mr. Obama? I can’t help but think of Bush’s endorsement of Brown as head of FEMA. Especially after seeing this quote from the NYT:
The president thinks that Ben’s done a great job as Fed chairman, that he has helped the economy through one of the worst experiences since the Great Depression and that he has essentially been pulling the economy back from the brink of what would have been the second Great Depression
Obama’s legacy rests on the validity Bernanke, Summers, Geithner, and others now. I sincerely hope I’m wrong, and that Bernanke did save us all. But skepticism runs deep deep in me, and for good reason. Bernanke’s predictions have been near-awful so far:
Best of luck to you Mr. Obama, sincerely. But I fear have offered your ear to the wrong crowd. Mr Volcker was the last decent Fed Chairman we had, and you essentially cast him out, favoring Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, and Ben Bernanke. History, a subject you know well, will be your judge. Heck of a job, Bernanke.






