WSJ Reporter Busts JPM Chief Economist’s Balls

Who is this Kelly Evans? I approve. Fascinating interview, especially the section around 5:30 where JPM’s Kasman burps that “The Fed is still our friend”, to which Evans replies, “I wonder if what we haven’t learned throughout this whole thing, is that the Fed is our enemy, to some extent.” Evans displays impressive knowledge of the issues at hand, has obviously done her homework, and she don’t pitch softballs. Good luck getting interviews with bank execs in the future, Kelly, but bravo!

Jim Rogers is Right

Guest post from SovereignMan.com. Published with author permission.

By Simon Black

April 28, 2011
Asuncion, Paraguay

Jim Rogers saw the writing on the wall for America several years ago.  He uprooted his wife and family from New York and went where the opportunity was– Singapore. Rogers has famously said that the best career advice he can give a young person setting out to make a fortune today is to become a farmer.

Unlike some news anchors, who seem to take the comment in jest, I believe he is completely serious.  Forget investment banking, derivatives trading, or managing a hedge fund.  The big fortunes of the coming decade or two may well be made in agriculture.

Those quick to dismiss the notion assume this means toiling in the fields all day from dawn to dusk.  Wrong. There are MANY ways of making a buck in farming and agriculture.

Farming itself is just one part of the supply chain.  You could supply seeds, chemicals, fertilizer or stock feed.  You could breed some exotic variety of cattle or pigs.  You could provide logistics services to get products to market.  You could even set up a fund to invest in agribusinesses on behalf of others.

There are literally dozens of ways to play this.

I just finished reading an uplifting account of a young Filipino entrepreneur (only thirty-one years old) who’s well on the way to floating his diversified agribusiness company on the Philippine Stock Exchange for P2 BILLION ($46.5 million).

In just 7 years, he’s grown the company, which does everything from selling livestock feed, to running rural supplies stores, to raising chicken hatchlings.

Annual sales have increased 9-fold from P200 million to P1.8 billion. Profits this year should hit P137 million based on company projections. By 2013 they’re targeting P425 million.  That’s US$10 million, give or take, in net profit, all from doing something very basic.

Put simply, so little new blood and talent has entered the agriculture business in the past generation that many business practices remain stuck in a time warp.

How many people do you know who majored in agricultural science at university?  How may people can you think of who stayed on to run their parents’ farm, or returned to the land to run their own business?

Now, compare that to how many bankers, brokers, accountants, and lawyers you know…

Ten years ago, NOBODY studied geology and people looked at you as though you had two heads if you said you wanted to be a mining engineer. Today, agriculture is in the same boat, and the complete dearth of new talent in the agricultural industry is a sure sign to me of the wide-open field of opportunity.

In the Philippines, so low-hanging was the fruit — if you’ll pardon the pun — that this young entrepreneur I just mentioned was able to double profits at his parents’ farm supply business when he took it over, simply by installing some off-the-shelf accounting software.

You may think this is an extreme example, but I can tell you that there are dozens of countries in the same situation. Paraguay is one of them.

We talk a lot in our discussions about ‘adding value’ as a means to generate income, either as an employee, professional, investor, or entrepreneur.  This is an important principle to understand because being able to generate independent income is absolutely necessary to become more self-reliant.

I’m quick to point out that the value creation process is often derived from solving problems– the bigger the problem, or the more people it affects, the greater the value created… and hence, the greater the reward.

Quite simply, there are a lot of problems to be solved in developing markets– lack of modernization, lack of technological know-how, lack of best business practice know-how, lack of financing and appropriate capital management, etc.

These are often second nature to many westerners who typically have both the knowledge and experience to make a big difference, and hence create a lot of value, overseas. One just needs the courage to do it… and prove Jim Rogers right.

Related Articles:

—————————————————————————–

This article courtesy of SovereignMan.com: Notes From The Field, a free newsletter dedicated to individual freedom, internationalization, asset protection and global finance. For a complimentary subscription, visit http://www.SovereignMan.com.

The Worst Advice I’ve Seen in Years

From Sovereignman.com

By Simon Black

April 18, 2011
Asuncion, Paraguay

When I woke up this morning and scanned through my usual digest– boots on the ground reports from overseas contacts, market summaries from Asian and European bankers, commentary from friends still in the intelligence community– a couple of things caught my eye that I want to tell you about.

Dagong Global Credit Rating Co is China’s leading credit rating agency. Credit rating agencies are the firms who are responsible, among other things, for scoring the credit risk of a particular asset or sovereign nation.

When they rate a security as “AAA”, premium safety, investors pile in. They’re an integral part of the financial system.

You undoubtedly remember that the world’s leading agencies– Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P, were all complicit in slapping AAA premium ratings on so many toxic mortgage-backed securities… and maintaining sound ratings for far too long on bankrupt nations like Greece and Portugal.

The entire industry lacks credibility at this point, and China’s Dagong agency aims to do something about that.

This morning I read Dagong president Guan Jianzhong’s remarks at a recent conference of Asian rating agency CEOs held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (one of my favorite cities).

In his speech, Guan called for the establishment of a global rating agency that follows clearly outlined international standards, effectively putting an end to the cowardly analysis that dominates the industry now and replacing it with a healthy dose of reality.

Putting its money where its mouth is, Dagong has a long-standing, negative outlook on US debt that doesn’t pull any punches. From its November 2010 report:

“In essence the depreciation of the U.S. dollar adopted by the U.S. government indicates that its solvency is on the brink of collapse, therefore it wants to cut its debt through the act of devaluation with the national will; such a move has severely harmed the interests of creditors.”

Following suit, S&P stunned financial markets this morning by revising its US outlook to ‘negative’, citing politicians’ inability to address medium-term and long-term challenges.

In total contrast, US News and World Report published an article a few days ago entitled Why you should buy U.S. Treasuries,” which amounts to the worst advice I’ve seen in years.

"Trust me, I'm good for it."

The article is devoid of any clear analysis which could support loaning our hard-earned savings to the most indebted nation in the history of the world in a rapidly depreciating currency at rates which have little chance of keeping up with inflation; instead, the author relies solely on patriotism:

“It has always been a bad idea to bet against America and our ability to prosper even against overwhelming difficulties. America will cut back its spending, innovate, and pay off its debts. We will earn our way out. It’s just how we do it…”

A more accurate statement would have been, “that’s how we used to do it…” Fact is, America’s economic problems are deep-seeded and neither political party can put forth a viable strategy for righting the ship. Even S&P is starting to realize this.

Even worse, it’s not just the politicians that don’t get it. From top to bottom, the culture in government service is an entrenched “me first [at the expense of taxpayers...]” attitude which encourages shortsighted decision making, and in some cases, even fraud.

If you’re still betting on America to come out on top, you’re taking a big risk. America first emerged as a major economic power, not because of government policies or political leadership, but because of the strong incentive that individual Americans had to work hard, take risks, and create value for others.

The incentive isn’t about patriotism… it’s about the benefit of their families and loved ones.

Americans like this still exist, and their desire to see their families and loved ones flourish through enterprise and value creation is as strong as ever. As the economic situation worsens with each passing day, more and more of these value creators look to greener pastures outside of America.

Maybe you should consider the same.
_______________________________________

This article courtesy of SovereignMan.com: Notes From The Field, a free newsletter dedicated to individual freedom, internationalization, asset protection and global finance. For a complimentary subscription, visit www.SovereignMan.com.

Captain Obvious (S&P) vs Captain Oblivious (Tim Geithner)

By Nomi Prins, author of It Takes a Pillage: An Epic Tale of Power, Deceit, and Untold Trillions

Last week, President Obama driveled on about nothing of consequence in his budget speech. Yeah, he said he’d push to roll back tax cuts for the wealthy and close some off-shore corporate tax loopholes, but he’s said both (many times) before and neither happened, so in terms of revenue enhancement, it’s a non-starter.

Today, S&P – that beacon of toxic asset rating foresight (which has yet to be slapped with any monetary accountability for its collusive role in bringing down our economy) came to the astonishing conclusion that the United States has a debt problem, and tagged the country with a ‘negative watch’ label. The S&P report proceeded to highlight fiscal spending issues, related political debating, and our ridiculously high debt vs. GDP percentage, which is only a few points below 100, as points of main contention. It paid minor lip service to the ‘financial crisis’ as being a factor. It surprisingly (not) shied away from blaming ongoing and potentially further devastating fallout from the overleveraged mortgage related assets still clogging the books of the Fed, housing agencies and financial firms as the banking system maintains the appearance of solvency only through federally supported accounting gimmickry and an exceedingly generous and ‘easy’ Federal Reserve keeping assets bid and rates low in the face of inflation it chooses to ignore.

Meanwhile, the media and Washington have been laser focused on $38 billion worth of budget cuts, a whopping 1 percent of the entire budget, which as slight as it is in the scheme of things, disproportionately chops public good buckets. Rather than the excruciating time sink and mind-numbing arguments, it might have been best to just lop 1% off the top of everything proportionately, but that would have been too easy, and not political enough. Maybe then we could have shifted focus to the real cause of our budget woes – which is that our economy continues to deteriorate and the people with the power to do something about it are lying about its very cause and thus its remedies.

The flashing fuchsia elephant at the core of our economic, and thus budget problems – remains the response to the financial homicide imparted by the big-banks and abetted by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. There was a choice to be made in Washington in the fall of 2008 – smack Wall Street into place, do a good-ole free-market – you fail if you deserve to fail, we’ll protect consumer assets and that’s it maneuver – and deal with possibly intense, but definable fall-out for a short period.  Or – lavish bailout upon guarantee upon subsidy upon asset purchase upon the lowest rates in our nation’s history on Wall Street, and wring the very possibility of a recovery out of the general economy from the get-go. Of course, the brilliant minds of our exceedingly-privileged, out-of-touch, economic leadership decided on the former, and are acting their asses off to pretend that that decision, in itself, wasn’t the cause of the economic problems that followed, from Main Street anemia, to commodity inflation to international disdain and a weak currency that has no right to even have the purchasing capacity it still does.

And, yet Tim Geithner had the audacity of job-security to take his debt ceiling ‘plea’, on the Sunday Morning talk show circuit – really, we will be in crisis and other countries will think poorly of our ability to pay our debts if we don’t raise the ceiling and increase our debt. In truth, it is Tim Geithner’s ego on the line, while his boss, through staggering absence of mention, is fine with assuaging it. Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke remained silent about the topic, not least because between the Fed and the Treasury department, more debt has been racked up and issued in the past two years than ever before.  Of course, the debt cap will get raised, just as it got raised under Treasury Secretaries Paul O’Neil, John Snow and Hank Paulson.

When Geithner got elevated from the NY Federal Reserve head position of aiding Wall Street in its time of need to the Treasury Department, from where he could rubber stamp the entire bailout notion as being essential to our survival as a nation, the amount of Treasury Security debt outstanding was $5.7 trillion (in tradable securities, and $591 billion in nonmarketable ones.)  In August 2008, just before the most powerful banks sucked the soul out of the country in every manner possible, Treasury debt outstanding was  $4.9 trillion.

Today, outstanding Treasury debt stands at $9.1 trillion, an increase of $4.2 trillion since the big bailout began, most of which occurred under Geithner, though it started under Hank Paulson, who in 2007 and recently on Tim’s behalf, has used all of Geithner’s current arsenal of reasons to request a sizeable debt cap increase. All of it, allegedly to avoid a Depression and propel us to what has been deemed a slow recovery by none other than the Treasury Department, the White House and the Federal Reserve.

Geithner can (and will) keep pretending that this seismic debt increase was a requirement to fix our main economy, even though the actual fiscal stimulus package of the Obama administration accounts for only 18% of this increase, so the numbers just don’t fly.  Indeed, they only make sense if you take into consideration other diversions, like the $1.37 trillion of Treasuries, about a trillion of which is in excess bank reserves, and the nearly $1 trillion of mortgage-related securities parked at the Fed, the $142 billion of mortgage-related assets at the Treasury deparment, and various remaining FDIC guaranteed bank debt hangover from the bailout period, and sundries like JPM Chase’s ongoing Fed backing for its Bear Stearns’s acquisition.

Meanwhile, our debt interest will be more than $430 billion this year, or more than ten times the amount being quibbled about by the elected partisan politicians that are debating it, as the value of our debt and debt-worthiness diminishes.

Anyone can make promises that at some time in the future, some of any budget will be more in check, or even that unicorns will overtake the oval office and do a better job running the economy, but the fact remains – misguided, larcenous policies created a boatload of debt to float a financial system that continues to suck us dry (near zero borrowing costs from non-zero lending through mortgage, personal loans, credit cars, or whatever), and until this fact is given even an iota of a percentage of the time that the smaller bantering is given, we will continue to sink further into a financial abyss of the Fed’s, Treasury department’s, bi-partisan Congress’ and executive leadership’s making, no matter who’s in charge. For now, there are those excess reserves at the Fed – just saying.

Visit Nomi Prin’s site here. Re-published with permission.

Page 5 of 24« First...2345678...Last »