Job Situation Still Bleak

These two charts, via ContraryInvestor.com (subscription), show another side of the jobs equation. The first shows overall labor participation. The last 10 years have not been kind, and declines in the overall % of employed Americans have accelerated. Just wait till the baby boomers all retire on Social-Security and Medicare.

The historical data is interesting, especially the big jump during the 1960′s-80′s. Presumably this is due to the shift from one-worker to two-worker households, as more women entered the workplace.

The second chart shows the # of weeks the average person has been unemployed. Not pretty, as you can see. Eventually many of these people become discouraged, and are no longer counted as unemployed, as they are not “actively” looking for work.

labor-participation-rate

So while November’s “surprise upside” #s were less-bad, the employment situation is still ugly. And much of November’s relative rosiness was due to seasonal adjustments and temporary Holiday jobs.

Buckle up and be ready for a double-dip. It seems inevitable, to me at least. The real test comes if/when the Fed stops buying Freddie/Fannie debt Spring 2010, as they currently plan to.

I’m convinced the programs will be extended once it becomes clear just how dependent this “recovery” is on government printing. Once they announce the “unforseen” need for continued bailouts and printing, inflation expectations will rise.

My guess is that Bernanke/Geithner, et al, will feign shock when things turn south as the current programs expire. But do they seriously expect the real markets to be take over after ending a $1.25 trillion MBS crack-binge?

John Paulson Bets on Bailouts

The smart money is betting on moral hazard. From Reuters:

He highlighted the attractive yields on credit issued by GMAC due in Sept 2011, the former General Motors automotive financing company that the U.S. government propped up at the end of 2008.

By Paulson’s thinking, the government involvement is equivalent to an explicit guarantee on GMAC’s finances.

‘So instead of buying (a) Treasury bond which yields 84 basis points, I can buy GMAC which is almost, I consider equivalent to a government bond and I can get 11 percent. That is why we have allocated so much money to this particular security,’ he said.

John Paulson knows the deal. The government has made a policy of bailing out bondholders, and not forcing them to take losses.

He knows this policy is a long-term disaster (hence the gold bet). But if you can’t change it, why not profit from it? A great example of why it’s dangerous to be short (for now). Back in April I warned bears about this problem in More Bailouts and Inflation Loom.

Paulson: Gold is the best currency

Everybody knows Paulson likes gold. In the same article he he offers some interesting insight as to exactly why he’s so bullish.

Even as credit and equity markets looked attractive, he did reiterate his concerns that over the long-term inflation will be a problem because the government’s mountain of stimulus cash will be difficult, politically, to withdraw from the economy.

‘Therefore we are concerned about high rates of inflation in the future. As an investor I became very concerned about having my assets denominated in U.S. dollars,’ he said.

‘So I looked for another currency in which to denominate my assets in. I feel that gold is the best currency.’

hat tip TraderMark

Hummer Sales Down 85% YoY

Who woulda thought the Hummer loophole would end badly? Another example of what happens when the government meddles in markets.

auto-sales-by-brand-yoy

Lots of other food for thought in this chart by Jake from Econompic.

Denninger: See, HAMP Really Was a Scam

This is a re-post from Karl Denninger’s site, which appears to be having technical difficulties. Hope Karl doesn’t mind.

You have to give these banksters credit – they’ll lie and lie and lie some more….

More than 650,994 loan revisions had been started through the Obama administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program as of last month, from about 487,081 as of September, according to the Treasury. None of the trial modifications through October had been converted to permanent repayment plans, the Treasury data showed. That failure is getting the administration’s attention.

None?  Out of 651,000 “trial” modifications none have turned into a permanent repayment plan?

That’s all the borrower’s fault, right?  There’s no collusion here, yes?  No intent to screw the taxpayer, having taken their money?  Nothing wrong here at all… it just calls for the administration’s “attention.”

Yeah, right.

“We are taking additional steps to enhance servicer transparency and accountability as part of a broader focus on maximizing conversion rates to permanent modifications,” Treasury spokeswoman Meg Reilly said in an e-mail yesterday. The Obama administration plans to announce additional steps tomorrow, including new private-public partnerships and resources for borrowers.

Bull.

What’s worse, Bank of America has only 14% of their “eligible” loans in a trial modification.  Citibank has 40% under trial, and JP Morgan/Chase 32%.

All in all, only 20% of those “eligible” have been offered, accepted, and are in a trial but zero percent – zero – have actually turned into a permanent loan modification that the homeowner can count on.

The administration program requires banks that received federal aid from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, as well as mortgage-finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to lower monthly payments for borrowers at “imminent risk” of default.

That’s some “requirement” eh?  Zero percent completion from June to October?  That’s five months, and the “trial” period is supposedly 90 days, so this means that either (1) nobody did anything for the first two months, or (2) not one borrower successfully completed a trial between June and now.

If the Obama Administration and Treasury was serious about this “help” they would be seeking indictments.

Oh wait – they can’t – there was no “or else” put into the law enabling HAMP, was there?  Just looked again – nope – no criminal or civil sanction in there for banks who are allegedly “required” to do these things.

I repeat: A law without a punishment for failure to comply is no law at all – it is nothing other than a scam and a fraud perpetrated by the government to make you “feel good” while in fact doing exactly NOTHING.

Wake me up when our government stops allowing the banks and regulators to both write laws without punishment clauses in them and violate black-letter laws with wild abandon without one person or firm in the bankster community ever going to prison, having their bonus clawed back, or having their corporate charter revoked.

Our so-called “President For Change”, President Obama, in fact has changed nothing, is permitting and encouraging the banksters to rob America blind, and forgot to tell you that the “change” you’re going to get (or keep) is the couple of worn pennies wrapped up in lint at the bottom of your pocket.

Page 14 of 25« First...11121314151617...Last »