Greenspan’s Mistakes, Visualized

This chart from ContraryInvestor.com (subscription req’d) shows 40+ years of Fed Fund rates vs. full CPI (including food and energy prices, excluding shelter/housing costs).

The disconnect between interest rates and CPI from 2002-07 is especially noteworthy in light of Greenspan’s recent arguments that low interest rates weren’t responsible for the housing bubble. Apparently giving banks access to a spigot of cash does not encourage reckless lending. Here’s Greenspan rationalizing extended low interest rates during this period:

We had been lulled into a sense of complacency by the modestly negative economic aftermaths of the stock market crash of 1987 and the dotcom boom

Given history, we believed that any declines in home prices would be gradual. Destabilizing debt problems were not perceived to arise under those conditions

Given that we had never seen home price appreciations this rapid, might an objective observer have thought something off? Someone who’s full-time job it was to assess these things?

Vacancies

Here’s another great chart from Contrary Investor (again – CI is subscription only, but well worth it IMO. I have no stake in posting these links, but they offer some of the best charts and analysis I’ve found).

The chart below shows various home and rental market vacancy stats. Though things have improved, we still have to see what goes down when (and if) the Fed/Govt ends their massive support programs (currently scheduled to expire near the end of Q1 2010). Things may start deteriorating all over again, but we’ll have to see.

Media Fail: Lack of Lehman Scandal Coverage

It seems like there’s an unofficial media brownout of the Lehman accounting scandal. Lack of coverage outside the blogosphere is disappointing to say the least. After chastising themselves for sleeping on the job in 2008/09, mainstream outlets have apparently slipped back into their old ways.

Sure, big media outlets are running some stories. But they aren’t front-page, for the most part. As CJR points out, NYT featured the $3b Tommy Hilfiger buyout over the Lehman story.

This Lehman report is only the biggest financial fraud since Enron. Bigger than Enron, actually. This isn’t a dig at at Dealbook and others at the NYT. They’re providing some great coverage, I just wish it was front and center.

Excerpt from the Columbia Journalism Review:

And just like that the Lehman Brothers scandal drops off the front pages. And not just the front pages—the section fronts, too.

Say, we just learned about a $50 billion fraud on Thursday. Think there might be some newsworthy follow-ups here? Actually there are, and both The New York Times and Wall Street Journal have them, but they stuff them inside.

The Journal, which scored recently by bringing David Reilly back into the fold after a stint at Bloomberg, posts a Reilly news article looking at the culpability of Lehman auditor Ernst & Young. The paper dumps it on C7. The NYT has on the same angle—a very good one to examine closely—and slides it inside on B2.

Somehow the Times thought more people would care about Sorkin’s scoop on a $3 billion deal for Tommy Hilfiger or that it was more important than an auditor approving accounting fraud. They don’t and it’s not.

Maybe it’s too dull or complicated for mainstream? The public devoured information about Bernie’s ponzi scheme, and this is much bigger than that. Yet I’m not seeing any sensationalist headlines. It’s all, “Accounting Gimmicks Discovered in Lehman Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Examiner Report”.

Lax coverage of a huge scandal like this just smells funny. Kind of like that nauseating Geithner fluff piece in the New Yorker. Playing ball with coverage on these issues may be the Price of Admission, as CJR suggests.

Tow the admin line, get exclusives and keep access to the White House. Am I getting too paranoid? That’s probably due to the fact that I keep reading about these crazy financial conspiracy theories on the web, and a few months later they turn out to be real.

More:

Jim Rogers: Let Greece Fail, It’d Be Good for the Euro

I love this guy. In the clip below, he dishes out his patently-straightforward analysis of the Greek debt problem. He demands accountability from the Greeks (and anybody else asking for a bailout), and dismisses concerns that sovereign CDS traders are the problem – “Were they the ones who increased deficits to 12% of GDP?”

Other talking points:

  • Will China let their currency float?
  • U.S. equities are “overdue” for a correction
  • He’s been long the dollar for 5-6 months and it’s still working.
  • Calls himself a “horrible stock market timer and trader”. This, from the guy who co-founded the Quantum Fund with George Soros, which saw returns of 4200% over the first 10 years.

hat tip Dollar Collapse.

Reviewing My Picks and Investment Theses

Occasionally I write about what I’m buying on this site, so thought it would be worthwhile to review my picks and the reasoning behind them.

Note: Performance %’s are from date of post to 03/05/2010. In many cases, I stopped out earlier on losers or sold winners. I provide additional color when possible.

The Bad

Long Gamestop (GME) @ $24.50: Down 26%. A devious value trap, which still looks cheap to me at 7x trailing P/E. But it gets no respect on Wall St. Everyone’s too busy speculating on BAC and the TBTF mafia, over-leveraged REITs, etc. I am still long GME, but it’ll probably be even cheaper soon.

Short Simon Properties (SPG) @ $51: Down 54%. I’ve traded around this position a few times, with total losses of around 25% on it. I didn’t cover my initial $51 short in the $20′s when I had the chance. Got greedy, figuring they were headed to zero just like GGP. Then the Fed/Gov stepped in with more liquidity than God, and raising capital became much easier, especially for a well-connected REIT like SPG.

Expensive lesson learned, covered that $51 short in the high 40′s. I’ve re-shorted since and been stopped out for losses a few times (and am still stubbornly watching for signs that the inevitable and long-awaited CRE shoe is finally dropping).

Long GRZZX (May 2009): Down 49%. I sold this short-only mutual fund for a 20% loss, as the bull market picked up steam and bailout bonanza really got under way. Theory was that it would be nice to have a diversified basket of shorts for the inevitable double dip.

At that point the market had already bounced 28% from lows. The world was ending, and this little bounce was dead-cat in nature. Boy was I early. Not to mention generally naive about the effects of government-mandated recklessness. A few days after I bought GRZZX in May, I wrote The Deck is Stacked Against Shorts. A month earlier I warned bears that More Bailouts and Inflation Loom. Shoulda been bargain hunting or speculating on garbage stocks.

The Good

Long AAPL @ $81 (Jan 2009): Trades at $218.95: Up 168%: Apple was a lesson in how to trade the next panic. When that crazy growth-monster momo stock you lust after (but don’t want to pay a premium for) crashes, BUY IT. Other examples: VMW, GOOG.

I bought more AAPL at prices ranging from $81-$93, and ended up with quite a large position (for me). If I remember correctly,  Apple was trading at around a 16x P/E with screaming earnings growth and $30/share in cash. There really were some bargains there for a while… Still holding around 1/3, house money. Sold the rest from $160-$194. The stock is a beast, no telling where it’ll stop.

Long Palladium bullion @ $250/ounce: (June ’09) Now trading at $470/ounce – Up 88% (June 2009). I think my thesis was solid, and appears to be playing out. Back then I said, “It may prove to be a good hedge against an inflation-fueled recovery. As the world continues to print money in an attempt to stimulate industry/consumers, demand and inflation could increase dramatically. This may in turn cause commodities like palladium to rise significantly, as governments artificially goose the markets.”

Long PGJ @ $13: (Jan ’09) Trades at $24.21 – Up 82%. My favorite China ETF. It has minimal financial sector exposure (unlike FXI, where the index is 40%+ finance stocks). Still holding most of this.

Long TRAMX @ $5.66: (May ’09) Now trades at $6.99 – Up 23%. Africa and Middle East mutual fund. If traditional emerging markets aren’t risky enough for you, you can buy this fund and get exposure to these politically volatile but fast-growing markets. Still holding.

Long EKWAX @ $45: (Jan 2009) Now trades at $73.29 – Up 58%: I love this gold fund. These guys know how to pick winners in the mining space. It’s up 602% over the last 10 years. I agree with George Soros here. Gold may eventually be a bubble, but it’s one that I want in on. And it has not come close to peaking yet, with countries around the world engaged in a currency race to the bottom. Still own it.

Morals of the Story, Lessons Learned

Overall I’m happy with the picks I’ve posted here. They either crushed it or bombed, not much in the middle.

I didn’t have enough long equity exposure in ’09, but the ones I did have made up for it. I also own gold and silver, which have done well.

One of the biggest lessons for me was the difficulty of shorting in an environment like this. The Fed has been pumping liquidity into the system like mad, and outcomes depend more on the actions of a few questionably-motivated creatures (who have abysmal track records) than actual fundamentals. Nothing to be done about that though, from an investing perspective anyway.

In hindsight, it was clearly better to bargain-hunt and speculate than short in ’09. My best gains of the year were pure speculation or value plays. I didn’t publish two of the big ones here, but I did post them on my old Motley Fool CAPS blog. One was CROX at $1.20 (trades at $7.49 today, 524% gain).  The other was Men’s Wearhouse @ $11.20 (trades at $25.17 today).

Reading hedge fund veterans like Bill Fleckenstein was quite helpful. I’ve been subscribing to his service for a while, and he closed his short-only fund near the market bottom, after a hugely profitable year. His short positions have been burnt by Fed Chairmen past, so he knew what effect all that Fed liquidity would have. He told readers he’d rather be in precious metals and cheap stocks than short.

I learned a lot about government intervention in general, and its impact on markets. Next time it looks like the world is ending, everyone should buy horrible pig stocks that will  benefit from the Feds’ clumsy/corrupt attempts to “stabilize the markets”, AKA bail out politically-connected mega-firms.

Page 27 of 69« First...24252627282930...Last »