Greenpeace: Fukushima Daiichi Is Actually 3 Level 7 Disasters

Update: The Guardian is reporting that (some) of the core uranium rods from unit 2 have melted through the containment vessel, and are likely reacting with the concrete floor. Not good (if true).

GreenPeace: It’s Already a Level 7 (3 of them, arguably)

Excerpt from a 3/25/2011 report by Greenpeace (PDF):

The total amount of radionuclides iodine-131 and caesium-137 released since the start of the accident until March 23rd, as reported by the two institutes require the Fukushima accident to be reclassified to the same level as the Chernobyl nuclear disaster twenty five years ago in April 1986. In fact so high are the releases that they amount to three INES 7 accidents.

Greenpeace is particularly concerned with the effects radioactive fallout will have on the densely populated landmass of Japan. A large proportion of the Chernobyl radioactivity fell on Belarus, with a population density of 40 persons per square kilometre. Japan by contrast has an average of 800 persons sq/km. Metropolitan Tokyo has density of over 1200 persons sq/km. [~40 million in greater Tokyo area - adam] The implications for collective dose of radiation to the population and human health are enormous.

In contrast to the Chernobyl accident which involved one nuclear reactor, Fukushima has suffered major failures at four. Three reactors have suffered loss of coolant to a scale that has led to nuclear fuel melting. In addition, nuclear reactor spent fuel stored at the site has lost coolant, caught fire and in one case suffered a hydrogen gas explosion which destroyed unit 4 at Fukushima.

Dr Hirsch concludes, ‘Taking all the releases from the Fukushima-daiichi reactors together this even obviously an INES 7 with the possibility that it is three INES 7′s, taking each reactor separately which results in a release of 100,000 Tbq each.’

Informative infographic from the Washington Post:

fukushima reactor status

Those down-playing the potential fallout from Japan’s nucelar crisis crisis, though well-intentioned, may be doing a disservice to those in affected areas. Residents whose lives may depend on the outcome deserve to hear the truth. TEPCO hasn’t been forthcoming from the start. Should we not prepare for the worst, and hope for the best?

Repeated assertions that “this is no Chernobyl” ring hollow, for now. Yes, Chernobyl lacked certain safeguards at place in Fukushima. But Japan’s population density  and the sheer quantity of fuel at stake (up to 24x Chernobyl’s total) put such statements into question. We simply don’t know yet.

 

 

Are You Sure You Want to Short the Meltup?

Microsoft paperclip trading advice

This piece, not looking so bad almost two years later.

Recall the golden rule: Good news is good, but bad news is much better. Besides, there are more interesting investments out there than shorting equities. Oil, metals, some stocks (I like GOOG), and eventually – the treasury bond short (which I am already in small).

By John Lohman, via ZH.

On the Faux-Jobs Recovery

Last five years ain’t pretty on the job front. And baby boomers are just now starting to retire.

Employment as Percent of US Population

At first glance, the chart below doesn’t look too horrific on a long-term basis.

employment as percent of populationChart via Zero Hedge (I really hope they keep that site free. It is invaluable).

One thing they didn’t note about employments percentages, though: Recall that women in America made up only 31% of the work force in 1964. Today, that number is closer to 49%.

Chart of Female Employment %

Source

I nearly failed business-stats in college, but I believe that when averaged out, an increase from 31% of women in the workplace to 49% (18%) would reflect an 9% artificial boost to that percent of population-employed chart.

Either way, it’s a bad-lookin graph. And on top of that, as living standards, spending, and borrowing rose in America, so did total hours worked. How many hours can Americans work? 50? 60? Till they’re 80? Hyperbole, of course. But it’s an important topic.

All these 65″ LCDs and McMansions are not without their price. Some of the “affordability” of these items is due to better productivity, but much relies on consumers working more, borrowing more. And on the private sector improving productivity, which should be reflected more in the form of lower consumer prices, but is counteracted by constant easy-money from the Fed.

Your Life According To The Government

A hilarious, cradle to the grave look at your life as seen through the government’s eyes…

Courtesy of Crush The Street.

Page 4 of 351234567...Last »