<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Krugman Really Advocate a Housing Bubble in 2002?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bearishnews.com/post/1022/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bearishnews.com/post/1022</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:49:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ROBERT</title>
		<link>http://www.bearishnews.com/post/1022/comment-page-1#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>ROBERT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bearishnews.com/?p=1022#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Here is the crucial quote. Note the emphasis at the end (it is mine.) Yes, Virginia, this is &quot;advocacy.&quot; read it again.

The problem with Krugman&#039;s mental model is that it does not take into account the after-effects of the stimulus. That was the case then; as it is the case now.


&quot;The basic point is that the recession of 2001 wasn&#039;t a typical postwar slump, brought on when an inflation-fighting Fed raises interest rates and easily ended by a snapback in housing and consumer spending when the Fed brings rates back down again. This was a prewar-style recession, a morning after brought on by irrational exuberance. To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan NEEDS TO CREATE A HOUSING BUBBLE to replace the Nasdaq bubble.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the crucial quote. Note the emphasis at the end (it is mine.) Yes, Virginia, this is &#8220;advocacy.&#8221; read it again.</p>
<p>The problem with Krugman&#8217;s mental model is that it does not take into account the after-effects of the stimulus. That was the case then; as it is the case now.</p>
<p>&#8220;The basic point is that the recession of 2001 wasn&#8217;t a typical postwar slump, brought on when an inflation-fighting Fed raises interest rates and easily ended by a snapback in housing and consumer spending when the Fed brings rates back down again. This was a prewar-style recession, a morning after brought on by irrational exuberance. To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan NEEDS TO CREATE A HOUSING BUBBLE to replace the Nasdaq bubble.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
